Agilent Community
Agilent Community
  • User
  • Site
  • Search the Community
  • User
Consumables
  • Technical Areas
Consumables
Wiki Pesticides and their stability during GC analyses
  • Announcements
  • Forum
  • Files
  • Wiki
  • More
  • Cancel
  • Consumables
  • A Beginner’s Guide to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography
  • A simple tip to protect your columns
  • A Tip for Preparing Robust and Consistent Mobile Phases
  • Achieve accurate and repeatable gas flow meter measurements
  • AdvanceBio Columns Blog Series
  • Agilent 123 Meter Sodium probe maintenance
  • Agilent Collection of Columns, Supplies, and Standards Resources
  • Analysis of microplastics in the environment
  • Analyzing ADCs by HIC
  • Avoiding downtime in the lab: top tips for GC/MS success
  • Best Practices for Aqueous Mobile Phases
  • Best Practices for Making Good Connections
  • Bio LC Column User Guides
  • Bursting Tubing and Columns (GC and HPLC)
  • Calculate the Maximum Allowable Working Pressure for Tubing
  • Calculating Column Volume
  • Cannabis Potency Testing: a Reliable, Cost-Effective Method
  • Carbohydrate Analyses in LC
  • Checking Your Intuition - Sub 2 µm vs Superficially Porous
  • Choosing the right GC Injection Technique
  • Choosing the right pore size for size exclusion chromatography
  • Columns, Supplies, and Standards Knowledgebase
  • Consumables Applications and Workflows
  • Consumables Recommended Supplies Lists for Agilent.com
  • Custom Product Request
  • Extreme Makeover – Derivatizations in Chromatography – Part 1 GC
  • Extreme Makeover – Derivatizations in Chromatography – Part 2 LC
  • Fake It Until You Make It: When BioInert Isn’t an Option
  • Flipping Amino Acid Analysis on Its Head
  • Glycans at a glance:  Analyzing therapeutic glycoproteins
  • Handle and Care of Syringes
  • Help! My Peaks Look Strange - Fronting and Tailing in GC
  • Help! My Peaks Look Strange - Saddle Points - LC/GC Troubleshooting
  • How do I select a Split/Splitless liner?
  • Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography of Proteins and mAbs
  • Importance of Silica Particle Strength for Sub-2 µm SEC Columns
  • KB: Ferrules recommended for GC self-tightening column nut
  • LC and LC/MS Columns - USP Designations
  • LC Column User Guides
  • LC Method Translation - the Dwell Volume
  • Minimize spectroscopy workflow disruptions
  • Minimizing Metals for Best HILIC Results
  • More than just a drink: Analyzing the elemental composition of beer
  • Multi-Attribute Methods – Peptide Mapping Part IV
  • Must See Webinars
  • Nomenclature of CFC's/Freons/Halons/Coolants
  • Oligonucleotide Analysis - Unexpected Details Matter
  • Optimizing Bonding Chemistry for Sub-2 µm SEC Particles
  • Pass the Salt, Please – Mobile Phase Preparation for HIC
  • Pesticides and their stability during GC analyses
  • Pre-Columns - the forgotten art of using retention gaps
  • Problematic polar analytes? Hello HILIC…
  • Protecting your laboratory productivity
  • Recommended Reading
  • Sample Prep Pointers - Peptide Mapping Part I
  • Save your results with sample filtration
  • Simplified cone inspection with the new Agilent LED measuring magnifier
  • Software - Supported Method Development - The Scanview Application
  • Software tool for the ADM Flow Meter (G6691A)
  • Stay Safe: A Win-Win for Solvent Storage
  • Streamline your sample processing
  • The importance of chemical composition for vial performance
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part I
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part II
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part III
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part IV
  • Tips for Smooth Sailing with HIC
  • Troubleshooting HPLC autosamplers
  • Troubleshooting HPLC degassers
  • Troubleshooting Sequence Coverage – Peptide Mapping Part III
  • UltiMetal Plus Flexible Metal Ferrule
  • UV, MS, TFA, and Formic Acid – What to use? Peptide Mapping Part II
  • What are the typical % Gain or EHT values for hollow cathode lamps?
  • You Need Lamps or Chemical Standards for Atomic Absorption Single-Element Analyses?
Still Need Help?

Post your question in our User Forum or Contact Support.

Pesticides and their stability during GC analyses

Created by Dr. Know Dr. Know over 2 years ago | Last modified by Dr. Know Dr. Know over 2 years ago

Introduction

Some pesticides are reported to be thermo-sensitive. As a result, they may show (partial) degradation in the injector. This process is in some cases aggravated by activity in the liner. The list includes:

 

Pesticide

Ref.

Structure

Aldrin

1

Captafol

1

Captan

1

Chlorbromuron

1

Chlorotoluron

1

Cycluron

1

Deltamethrin

1

Dichlofluanid

7

Diuron

1

Fluometuron

1

Iprodione

1

Metobromuron

1

Monolinuron

1

Tolylfluanid

7

Trichlorfon

5

 

 

N-methylcarbamate Pesticides

The N-methylcarbamate pesticides can only be analyzed by GC under special conditions. They are thermo-labile and as a consequence will degrade almost completely in a hot split/splitless injector. Degradation occurs also inside the column because of thermal stress. This applies to the following carbamates [9, 14, 15]:

 

Pesticide

Ref.

Structure

Aminocarb

9

Bendiocarb

9

Carbaryl

9

Dioxacarb

9

 

 

Endrin and DDT

Degradation commonly occurs in active or poorly deactivated injection port liners. 4,4’-DDT degrades into 4,4’-DDE and 4,4’-DDD, Endrin into Endrin ketone and Endrin aldehyde. The EPA protocol SW-846 [6] stipulates the regular check for Endrin and DDT degradation products. If the breakdown exceeds the 15 % level action must be taken. The breakdown is especially a concern for injection methods with an extended sample contact with the liner; these methods include splitless and large volume injections. Various types of commercially available specially deactivated liners can limit the breakdown level.

 

Pesticide

Ref.

Structure

4,4’-DDT

6

4,4’-DDE

6

4,4’-DDD

6

Endrin

6

Endrin ketone

6

Endrin aldehyde

6

 

 

Other Pesticides

Pesticide

Ref.

Structure

 

Amitraz

2

sensitive to hydrolyzation during extraction

Carbosulfan

2

sensitive to matrix induced decomposition in the liner

Dichlofluanid

2

may degrade by chemical reactions with thiol groups in the matrix during extraction

Methoxychlor

 

also reported as a thermo-labile pesticide

Phoxim

2

sensitive to matrix induced decomposition in the liner

 

 

Synthetic pyrethroids

Some synthetic pyrethroids seem to show breakdown induced by the liner. This is caused by poor liner deactivation or by active glass wool. Also an increase in recovery of 50-140% has been observed for Cypermethrin, Deltamethrin and Fenvalerate due to matrix influences. Possibly through liner deactivation by the matrix. Tetramethrin [3] seems less sensitive for degradation. Esfenvalerate, cis-Permethrin and trans-Permethrin have a limited storage time in natural water samples. It is advised to analyze these within 24 hours of sample collection. The list of affected pyrethroids include:

 

Pesticide

Ref.

Structure

Isomers

Cyfluthrin

3

8

Cypermethrin

3

8

Deltametrin

3

1

Esfenvalerate

10

1

Fenvalerate

3

4

Permethrin

3

4

cis-Permethrin

10

2

trans-Permethrin

10

2

 

Lambda-Cyhalothrin is converted inside the liner into its cis-A isomer by epimerization. The liner materials, quartz or borosilicate glass, seem of major influence. Lambda-Cyhalothrin is also degraded inside the column at temperature above 240 °C. These results are based on the analyses of pure components without any matrix influence [4].

 

 

Natural pyrethroids

The GC analysis of natural pyrethroids is critical. Good analytical results can be obtained using on-column injections, short columns and high column flows thus limiting the thermal stress [8].

 

Pesticide

Ref.

Structure

Comment

Pyrethrin I

8

thermal isomerization above 210 °C

Pyrethrin II

8

thermal isomerization above 210 °C

Cinerin II

8

some isomerization during splitless injection

Jasmolin II

8

some isomerization during splitless injection

 

 

References

  1. P. Sandra, J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1000, 299.

  2. Validation of Multiresidue Screening Methods for the Determination of 186 Pesticides in 11 Agricultural Products Using Gas Chromatography;
    Y. Hirahara et al., J. Health Sci. 2005, 51(5), 617-627.

  3. Effect of Injector Conditions on the Reproducibility of Gas Chromatographic-Electron Capture Detection of Sterol Derivatives and Synthetic Pyrethroids.
    L. Y. Jayasinghe, P. J. Marriott, A. M. Nguyen, J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 1999, 22(6), 362-366.

  4. Tony Baker, Syngenta, Jealotts Hill International Research Centre, 2006. Personal communication.

  5. Evaluation of Automated and Manual Hot-Splitless, Cold Splitless (PTV), and On-Column Injection Technique Using Capillary Gas Chromatography for the analysis of Organophosphurus Pesticides; H.-M. Müller, H.-J. Stan, J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 1988, 11, 140-143.

  6. Environmental Test Methods and Guidelines, Environmental Protection Agency

  7. Matrix-induced effects: a critical point in the gas chromatographic analysis of pesticide residues; J. Hajšlová, K. Holadova et. al., J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 800, 283-295.

  8. Optimized Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Natural Pyrethrins and Pyrethroids; T. J. Class; J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 1991, 14 (1), 48-51.

  9. Thermal Degradation Observed with different Injection Techniques: Quantitative Estimation by the Use of Thermo-labile Carbamate Pesticides; H.-M. Müller, H.-J. Stan; J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 1990, 13, 759-763.

  10. New Method for the Analysis of Pyrethroid Insecticides: Esfenvalerate, cis-Permethrin and trans-Permethrin in Surface Waters Using Solid-Phase Extraction and Gas Chromatography; M. J. Hengel, C. R. Mower, T. Shibamoto, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1997, 59, 171-178.

  11. Optimization ans application of the PTV injector for the analysis of pesticide residues; M. Godula, J. Hajšlová, K. Maštouska, J. Krivánková, J. Sep. Sci. 2001, 24, 355-366.

  12. Matrix-Induced Effects in Analysis of Trace Pesticides in Sediments by GC-MS; K. Ito, M. Yamauchi, T. Mukai, K. takimoto, M. Okada, Anal. Sci. 2001, 17 Suppl., i921-i923.

  13. Compendium of Pesticide Common Names; A. Wood 2006, http://www.alanwood.net/pesticides/

  14. Determination of thermo-labile urea pesticides after derivatization with HFBA using GC-ECD and confirmation by means of GC-MSD; H.-J. Stan, P. Klaffenbach, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 1991, 339(1), 40-45.

  15. Pesticide residue analysis in food with CGC - study of long-term stability by the use of different injection techniques; H.-M. Müller, H.-J. Stan; J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 1990, 13, 697-701.

  • ddt
  • degradation
  • Syringes and Sample Introduction
  • gc columns
  • General
  • thermal degradation
  • dde
  • ddd
  • pyrethroid
  • GC
  • pesticides
  • Share
  • History
  • More
  • Cancel
Anonymous
Related

Agilent Community Feedback

Agilent Community Feedback

×
We are glad this was helpful! We are sorry this was not helpful. If you still need assistance please create a community post or contact support. To help us improve, please provide any additional feedback. For full details of how we will treat your information, please view our privacy policy.
Submit Cancel
Submit Cancel
Recommended
Privacy Statement
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Site Help