Agilent Community
Agilent Community
  • User
  • Site
  • Search the Community
  • User
Consumables
  • Technical Areas
Consumables
Wiki A Beginner’s Guide to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography
  • Announcements
  • Forum
  • Files
  • Wiki
  • More
  • Cancel
  • Consumables
  • A Beginner’s Guide to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography
  • A simple tip to protect your columns
  • A Tip for Preparing Robust and Consistent Mobile Phases
  • Achieve accurate and repeatable gas flow meter measurements
  • AdvanceBio Columns Blog Series
  • Agilent 123 Meter Sodium probe maintenance
  • Agilent Collection of Columns, Supplies, and Standards Resources
  • Analysis of microplastics in the environment
  • Analyzing ADCs by HIC
  • Avoiding downtime in the lab: top tips for GC/MS success
  • Best Practices for Aqueous Mobile Phases
  • Best Practices for Making Good Connections
  • Bio LC Column User Guides
  • Bursting Tubing and Columns (GC and HPLC)
  • Calculate the Maximum Allowable Working Pressure for Tubing
  • Calculating Column Volume
  • Cannabis Potency Testing: a Reliable, Cost-Effective Method
  • Carbohydrate Analyses in LC
  • Checking Your Intuition - Sub 2 µm vs Superficially Porous
  • Choosing the right GC Injection Technique
  • Choosing the right pore size for size exclusion chromatography
  • Columns, Supplies, and Standards Knowledgebase
  • Consumables Applications and Workflows
  • Consumables Recommended Supplies Lists for Agilent.com
  • Custom Product Request
  • Extreme Makeover – Derivatizations in Chromatography – Part 1 GC
  • Extreme Makeover – Derivatizations in Chromatography – Part 2 LC
  • Fake It Until You Make It: When BioInert Isn’t an Option
  • Flipping Amino Acid Analysis on Its Head
  • Glycans at a glance:  Analyzing therapeutic glycoproteins
  • Handle and Care of Syringes
  • Help! My Peaks Look Strange - Fronting and Tailing in GC
  • Help! My Peaks Look Strange - Saddle Points - LC/GC Troubleshooting
  • How do I select a Split/Splitless liner?
  • Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography of Proteins and mAbs
  • Importance of Silica Particle Strength for Sub-2 µm SEC Columns
  • KB: Ferrules recommended for GC self-tightening column nut
  • LC and LC/MS Columns - USP Designations
  • LC Column User Guides
  • LC Method Translation - the Dwell Volume
  • Minimize spectroscopy workflow disruptions
  • Minimizing Metals for Best HILIC Results
  • More than just a drink: Analyzing the elemental composition of beer
  • Multi-Attribute Methods – Peptide Mapping Part IV
  • Must See Webinars
  • Nomenclature of CFC's/Freons/Halons/Coolants
  • Oligonucleotide Analysis - Unexpected Details Matter
  • Optimizing Bonding Chemistry for Sub-2 µm SEC Particles
  • Pass the Salt, Please – Mobile Phase Preparation for HIC
  • Pesticides and their stability during GC analyses
  • Pre-Columns - the forgotten art of using retention gaps
  • Problematic polar analytes? Hello HILIC…
  • Protecting your laboratory productivity
  • Recommended Reading
  • Sample Prep Pointers - Peptide Mapping Part I
  • Save your results with sample filtration
  • Simplified cone inspection with the new Agilent LED measuring magnifier
  • Software - Supported Method Development - The Scanview Application
  • Software tool for the ADM Flow Meter (G6691A)
  • Stay Safe: A Win-Win for Solvent Storage
  • Streamline your sample processing
  • The importance of chemical composition for vial performance
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part I
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part II
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part III
  • Tips & Tricks for Amino Acid Analysis – Part IV
  • Tips for Smooth Sailing with HIC
  • Troubleshooting HPLC autosamplers
  • Troubleshooting HPLC degassers
  • Troubleshooting Sequence Coverage – Peptide Mapping Part III
  • UltiMetal Plus Flexible Metal Ferrule
  • UV, MS, TFA, and Formic Acid – What to use? Peptide Mapping Part II
  • What are the typical % Gain or EHT values for hollow cathode lamps?
  • You Need Lamps or Chemical Standards for Atomic Absorption Single-Element Analyses?
Still Need Help?

Post your question in our User Forum or Contact Support.

A Beginner’s Guide to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography

Created by anne_blackwell anne_blackwell over 2 years ago | Last modified by Agilent Agilent over 2 years ago

An introduction to a salty complement to reverse phase chromatography to add to your analytical toolbox

 

Hello everybody! This week kicks off a series of blog posts on a topic that’s completely new to me. I’ve therefore asked some of my colleagues to contribute while I learn alongside you. My colleague Greg from our R&D team is going to get us started.

 

---

 

This blog series will tell you everything you need to know (I hope!) about a mode of chromatography that you might not be familiar with: hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC). If you’ve never used HIC in your lab, you’re not alone. HIC is not nearly as common as other separation methods such as size exclusion or reversed-phase (RP). However, HIC is becoming a lot more popular, as evidenced by the increasing number of conference and literature presentations on the subject. The reason? Increasingly complex protein therapeutics continue to put our analytical techniques to the test, and HIC is a valuable option for taking on these separation challenges.

 

I’ve always enjoyed the history of science and I like to kick off learning about unfamiliar techniques by investigating their origins. The term “hydrophobic interaction chromatography” didn’t appear until 1973 [1], but the groundwork for this separation mode was first reported in 1948 [2]. At the time, it was well known that proteins can be precipitated using high concentrations of salts. The new twist was the observation that proteins adsorbed strongly to sorbents for which they would ordinarily have only weak affinity at salt concentrations much lower than would normally be required for precipitation. The first appearance of HIC in a chromatographic format was in 1962, when serum proteins were separated on cross-linked dextran [3]. Materials substituted with hydrophobic functionality appeared in the early 1970s [4, 5], with sorbents offering, “pure” hydrophobic interaction (without any ion exchange properties) appearing in 1973 [6].

 

HIC has advanced tremendously since it was first described and is often used for large-scale protein purification. In this case, HIC is useful for removing protein aggregates and contaminants such as host cell proteins [7, 8]. HIC is also used for small scale analytical separations, which will be the focus of our blog series. Due to its unique selectivity, HIC is complementary to techniques like size exclusion, ion exchange, and RP. Of these techniques, HIC is most like RP, in that separation is strongly correlated with protein hydrophobicity. But there are two key differences between HIC and RP: First, HIC separations are driven by a decreasing gradient of salt, rather than an increasing gradient of organic solvent as in RP. Second, HIC separations maintain the native state of a protein, and thus the protein remains biologically active following the separation. This activity allows collection of purified peaks for downstream potency assays, for example. Furthermore, the native state of the protein means that features on the surface of a protein tend to drive selectivity in HIC mode. Therefore, HIC is particularly suited to separating post-translational modification or degradation products of a protein, which is sometimes difficult to achieve by other modes of chromatography.

 

We should spend a little time addressing the topic of salts. Initial conditions for HIC separations start with a very high concentration of salts called lyotropic salts. These salts, which are unique in their ability to “salt out” proteins, are conveniently summarized in the Hofmeister series. The most commonly used lyotropic salt in HIC is ammonium sulfate, and separations typically start with concentrations in the 1–2 M range. The concentration of ammonium sulfate is gradually reduced over the course of the gradient, and proteins are separated according to their relative hydrophobicity (the more hydrophobic, the later the RT - thus lower concentrations of salt are required for more hydrophobic proteins). There’s been considerable work on understanding the mechanism of HIC separations. If you’d like to read a summary on some of the investigations into protein behavior on HIC, I’ll point you to a review by Lienqueo [9].

 

Proteins elute in order of increasing hydrophobicity as the salt content of the mobile phase decreases.

 

So how about some recent examples of how HIC is being used for biologics characterization? One of the main success stories relates to antibody drug conjugate (ADC) characterization [10]. In this case, HIC can be used to separate ADCs based on the number of conjugated small molecule drugs, and is thus useful for calculating the drug to antibody ratio or DAR [11]. HIC has also been shown to separate Asp/IsoAsp isomers as well as succinimide variants [12] and oxidation variants of methionine and tryptophan [13]. Bispecific mAbs, a modality of increasing importance, can be analyzed using HIC, in particular for assessing the population of parental mAbs versus the intended bispecific product [14]. Relative hydrophobicity of proteins can also be assessed, as a potential indicator of aggregation [10].

 

Methionine oxidation and aspartic acid isomerization are two of the post-translational modifications monitored by HIC.

 

I hope this introduction gives you a taste of what HIC has to offer and that you enjoy this blog series. I think you’ll find there’s lots of reasons to add HIC to your analytical toolbox if you haven’t already. The advent of so many new therapeutic modalities will surely provide some opportunities to shine for this powerful mode of separation.

 

--

 

Hi all, Anne here again. Thanks, Greg! Over the next few weeks we’ll expand upon some of the topics Greg touched on – salts and mobile phase preparation, method development for ADCs and other proteins, and some best practices to stay out of trouble while using high salt mobile phases. Until next time.

 

Anne

 

References:

  1. Hjerten, S., Some general Aspects of Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography. J Chromatogr, 1973. 87: p. 325-331.
  2. Tiselius, A., Adsorption Separation by Salting Out. Arkiv foer Kemi, Mineralogi och Geologi, 1948. 26B: p. 1-5.
  3. Porath, J., Zone Precipitation. Nature, 1962. 196: p. 47-48.
  4. Yon, R.J., Chromatography of Lipophilic Proteins on Adsorbents Containing Mixed Hydrophobic and Ionic Groups. Biochem J, 1972. 126: p. 765-767.
  5. Er-el, Z., Y. Zaidenzaig, and S. Shaltiel, Hydrocarbon-coated Sepharoses. Use in the Purification of Glycogen Phosphorylase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1972. 49: p. 383-390.
  6. Porath, J., et al., Salting-out in Amphiphilic Gels as a New Approach to Hydrophobic Adsorption. Nature, 1973. 245: p. 465-466.
  7. Jiang, C., et al., Defining process design space for a hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) purification step: application of quality by design (QbD) principles. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2010. 107(6): p. 985-97.
  8. McCue, J.T., et al., Modeling of protein monomer/aggregate purification and separation using hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2008. 31(3): p. 261-75.
  9. Lienqueo, M.E. and A. Mahn, Predicting Protein Retention Time in Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2005. 28(11): p. 1326-1334.
  10. Fekete, S., et al., Hydrophobic interaction chromatography for the characterization of monoclonal antibodies and related products. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2016. 130: p. 3-18.
  11. Wakankar, A., et al., Analytical methods for physicochemical characterization of antibody drug conjugates. mAbs, 2014. 3(2): p. 161-172.
  12. Valliere-Douglass, J., A. Wallace, and A. Balland, Separation of populations of antibody variants by fine tuning of hydrophobic-interaction chromatography operating conditions. J Chromatogr A, 2008. 1214(1-2): p. 81-9.
  13. Boyd, D., T. Kaschak, and B. Yan, HIC resolution of an IgG1 with an oxidized Trp in a complementarity determining region. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2011. 879(13-14): p. 955-60.
  14. Zwolak, A., et al., Rapid Purification of Human Bispecific Antibodies via Selective Modulation of Protein A Binding. Sci Rep, 2017. 7(1): p. 15521.

 

 Keywords: Bio columns, liquid chromatography, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, HIC, AdvanceBio blog

  • hic
  • bio columns
  • advancebio blog
  • hydrophobic interaction chromatography
  • Biopharma LC Columns & Consumables
  • liquid chromatography
  • Share
  • History
  • More
  • Cancel
Anonymous
Related

Agilent Community Feedback

Agilent Community Feedback

×
We are glad this was helpful! We are sorry this was not helpful. If you still need assistance please create a community post or contact support. To help us improve, please provide any additional feedback. For full details of how we will treat your information, please view our privacy policy.
Submit Cancel
Submit Cancel
Recommended
Privacy Statement
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Site Help