How do I create an RT to RI calibration?

Hi JamesRS,

It sounds like you are looking for the Quant Tool "Retention Time Calibration," which is located in the Windows start menu under Agilent MassHunter Quantitative folder -> Quantitative Analysis Tools. 

Additionally, there are some videos about using Refractive Index that are included on Quant media (either the USB thumb drive or the downloaded .UFD.) Specifically, the "Library - Retention Index - RI RT CAL map - Advanced" video goes over how to use the tool and create the calibration file. If you registered the software in Agilent.Subscribenet.com, you can re-download Quant to access these videos if they aren't already installed on the PC.  The videos are located at \Supplemental\MassHunter\Videos\Quant on the media. 

As @brittpeterson referenced, you will need to use the "RT Calibration" program to convert a set of results into a calibration file.
To create the calibration file, you will need to create a batch in Masshunter Quant with just those samples and create a library with only the alkanes/calibration compounds. The batch and library will run automatically to create an output, there is no method involvement there. When creating our RT file, I found it best to create a custom library with only the relevant alkanes and verifying the matches myself in Quant before running through the program.

Hey msweber,

can you possibly explain how you do this in detail? Do I have to create a library using the Library Editor or can I do it more quickly? Is it not possible to use the NIST database?

Thank you in advance

Hey msweber,

can you possibly explain how you do this in detail? Do I have to create a library using the Library Editor or can I do it more quickly? Is it not possible to use the NIST database?

Thank you in advance

It is absolutely possible using the NIST database, the reason I suggest creating a separate library is so you can control various parameters, mainly:

• specific compound name
• eliminate possibility of incorrect or undesired matches

When you've created a custom library in library editor with 4 compounds with very clear peak and retention times, there is no chance of a "Dodecane" being identified as "Undecane"

It is possible that you can do this more quickly using PCDL Manager, however I haven't had the opportunity to test that software. 

I'm not sure which step you would like more in depth and it can easily become a multiple page post to detail each individual step in depth.

Step by step:

1. Create a custom library using Library Editor and a higher concentration sample for target spectra.
2. Verify the accuracy of the library vs samples by trying to run through Quant with your new custom library as the only listing in "Library Search" of library method.
3. Create batch file in Quant with the file(s).
4. Use the "Retention Time Calibration" tool to create an RTC file.

The RTC file has been created so far. I would like to use the RT Calibration File at Masshunter Qualitative Analysis, but a CSV file is required there? What do I have to do to make a CSV from the RTC file?

The method editor should accept either a CSV or an RTC file

I am using v7 - this version requires a csv file

Hi jelljell,

From what I can find the RTC file is a CSV file. I believe this extension was created to help with file organization in later versions of MassHunter. So you should be able to change the extension and then use it in Qual.

Another alternative, at least in newer versions of the RT Calibration tool, is to specify the extension as .csv when creating the calibration file. 

Hi, can you shed some light over how to RTC creation was achieved? I have created custom library, using NIST as reference source to identify the RI-alkanes in my pure RI sample. Created a batch file - however here in Quant it wants me to 'analyse' the file before saving it. To analyse it wants me to 'calibrate' the file. I am stuck here, I don't do quantification stuff so not sure what I am doing here. I just want to create an RTC for Qual and Unknowns analysis. The videos weren't much help as they said, "usual analysis was performed using 0.1 calibration curve"...