Issue with relatively similar CPS from 7800

I have inherited a 7800 from a new job, when I run the standard method for the technique all of the counts come out relatively similar. Running a blank and then a calibration standard returns the same results, approximately. The instrument has been cleaned from the lens all the way back to replacing the sampling probe in the last couple of days. However, I still get relatively the same number for CPS of every element. I attempted to check each of our solutions via the signal monitor, only paying attention to Li. When I run the blank it returns a count of ~150 for Li and when I run the standard I get ~250-300 for Li, using the signal monitor. Along with cleaning everything, I also switched out all the standards for ones ran on a 7850 that came back fine on that instrument. I replaced the ISIS 3 the other day because it wasn't drawing up correctly and I just noticed that an error: 2607 Warning Y-axis movement disabled due to a partially closed top cover today. I am trying to figure out why this instrument returns the same values for all elements. They have not run this instrument for a couple of months and last batch I see, seems to have worked fine. Any suggestions or ideas would be helpful, I appreciate it.

Parents
  • Have you run the full startup tasks (torch axis, EM, resolution, standard lens tune, performance report etc)? Does it proceed without error and does it compare to those run prior if you do have history? For the performance report using a 1ppb tune solution (run through the carrier line to test) you should get >3000 for Li, 10000 for Y and 6000 for Tl. I would start there. If it is very poor you have a place to work from with troubleshooting. If it is good then I suspect the batch tune parameters need optimizing. Also if the instrument has been sitting without use I suspect the cell gases need purging for any He/H2 work. 

  • I have run the full startup, it does not give errors and unfortunately the record keeping of past performance reports is few and far between. I found one from January of this year to compare to and at least check what everything was set at with that report. The instrument has been sitting for awhile and I noticed this morning that the He was out. I changed out the cylinder and am currently purging the line.

Reply
  • I have run the full startup, it does not give errors and unfortunately the record keeping of past performance reports is few and far between. I found one from January of this year to compare to and at least check what everything was set at with that report. The instrument has been sitting for awhile and I noticed this morning that the He was out. I changed out the cylinder and am currently purging the line.

Children
No Data
Was this helpful?