OpenLab Chemstation C.01.10 Dual FID Report

Hello,

Are you looking for a single injection report or is this for a summary report? When you setup the calibration table are you doing main peak and qualifiers or are the compounds calibrated separately in the 2 signals. How many compounds are in your calibration table? 

Marty Adams

Hello,

Are you looking for a single injection report or is this for a summary report? When you setup the calibration table are you doing main peak and qualifiers or are the compounds calibrated separately in the 2 signals. How many compounds are in your calibration table? 

Marty Adams

Hello,

Is this the type of table you are looking for?

Marty Adams

Hello,

It is a single injection report. The compounds are calibrated separately on each signal. I have 18 compounds per signal (2 are ISTDs).  I am essentially looking for something like the attached picture, if possible. 

Hello,

That looks more like MSD Chemstation than OpenLab Chemstation or the previous equivalent so that is likely the difference in the reporting. You would need to create a hidden table at the top for the second signal. in the table, you could then store the RT, Area, and Conc in a variable keyed on compound_name. Those variables could then be displayed in a visible table below filtered for signal A so you could have 2 values per line. 

Marty 

Hello,

See the attached screen capture video for an example of the request report modifications. Please note that when I talk about and name the variables peak B I am referring to the compounds in the B signal channel. Also, the example was done in CDS 2.x IR but the same process can be used in Chemstation IR. 

Marty

/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/26/2024_2D00_01_2D00_18_5F00_15_2D00_41_2D00_13.mp4

Marty,

I appreciate you taking the time to provide the video and thorough instructions. I was able to follow along with no issue and essentially match what you had done throughout. The one difference was I used the Short ISTD as a template. I'm not sure if that will make a difference in my follow up question. I am applying the modified report to my quantitation method, but I am getting different reports in the Data Analysis tab and the Review tab. I've attached a copy of both. The Review tab report looks exactly how I want it, but for some reason is not pulling data over. The Data Analysis report is, well, a mess. It isn't hiding tables at all. I typically review data in the Data Analysis tab and generate a report by using the Classic Quantitation option. I changed my report to Intelligent Report and selected the file, as well. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?

Marty,

It seems the core of the issue is that my compound names do not pull like your compounds and information (RT, area, amount) do in your demo. I have the calibration table established on both detectors and with the same exact name. If I have to generate reports in the review tab from now on to accomplish this style of reporting, that's perfectly fine. So, that may not be as big of an issue.