BFB tune problem (VOC method)

Hi all

 

I have recently encountered a problem in my bfb.u tune file parameters..

All of the sudden, my 5973 won't pass bfb tune (*inconsistent peek width*) (pic 1) though it passes Atune (pic 2) just fine..

 

Enclosed for reference are images taken from profile scan in manual tune

 

PIC 1

Atune profile scan

 

PIC 2

Bfb profile scan

 

 

* running MSD chemstation G1701EA E.02.02.1431

 

a few corrective actions I've run through already:

- filament change (both of them)

- column trimming (both ends), septa liner change

- Ion source cleaning (according to Agilent 5973 hardware manual document)

 

** haven't tried MSD baking (don't believe it would help)

 

We believe this bfb tune failure directly effects the following step of the VOC method of BFB P&T injection and running/ passing its test (pic 3)  

 

It keeps failing at the same mass target comparison of 50 to 95... which led us to believe a problem exists with tuning at the lower masses..

 

*** While opening the MS for cleaning we noticed the quad mass filter heater assembly wires (only the two upper white ones) have been welded.. probably an old "fix".. so I am wondering if this could effect low mass selective..? of course, all temperatures are as they should be..

 

Will appreciate any input

Thanks in advance

Roy

Parents Reply Children
No Data
Was this helpful?